Rand Paul says that he 100% agrees with 9/10ths of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and he would have been right there marching with everyone if he was old enough! And if he was in office then he would have signed into law every section but ONE.
He says that he believes the government shouldn't be allowed to limit, control, or dictate what any privately owned businesses do and that one section of The Civil Rights Act does just that.
One example he used was should the government be allowed to tell store owners they have to let everyone bring a gun into their store? Of course not! Well he says that the government dictating to privately owned businesses WHO they HAVE to provide their services to is the same thing! So the protection of individuals from discrimination shouldn't be allowed because it's 'government control' of privately owned businesses.
What?
He is saying that he believes that private businesses should have the right to 'refuse to serve' anyone they want for any reason. To prove his point he compares an owners right to not allow GUNS in his store to not allowing certain PEOPLE in his store!
Read The Immoral Minority latest entry, "Rand Paul does damage control. Carefully written (possibly by a ghostwriter), damage control." which details so well how he's 'explaining' it again!
Seriously, isn't there one person who can explain to him in a way he can understand that no matter how many different ways he says it and no matter how many things he tries to compare it to.....it's wrong and he's wrong!
Again a huge thank you to Gryphen!
Peace, Light and Take Care
No comments:
Post a Comment